Thursday
July 29, 2010


News
Calendar
Viewpoints
Editorials
Letters
Ken Trainor
Shrubtown
Lifelines
Sports
Journal Plus

Blogs

Community Guide
Special Sections

About Us
Feedback
Send us letters



Legal Notices






Search


Advanced Search

home : viewpoints : letters

4/8/2008 10:00:00 PM Email this articlePrint this article 
Galewood used OP techniques to integrate

Mr. Messina responded to Dan Lauber's rebuttal and decried being referred to with a number of less-than-flattering terms, including naïve, and then proceeds to prove that that term fits pretty well. [Galewood integrated without engineering, Viewpoints, April 2]


Mr. Messina's implication that Galewood has been integrating without the pro-active efforts that Oak Park has used, such as the limitations on real estate For Sale signs, that Galewood accomplished this in a vacuum working in the free market without any "Social Engineering," is certainly naïve, or at least uninformed.


A large part of Galewood's integration successes are primarily due to its proximity to
Oak Park and its success. In addition, community organizations in Galewood and areas north and east of Galewood for years worked to stabilize the neighborhoods that allowed integration to work using many of the same strategies as Oak Park's, including minimizing For Sale sign use.


Mr. Messina's own alderman, living only a couple blocks away from him, was instrumental in those efforts as well. Through my involvement in
Chicago community organizations, I recall attempts at panic-peddling, which Mr. Messina believes is done, only four or five blocks north of him in the 1990s.


He's not fully understanding what's gone on around him. He lists other communities that he states enjoyed comfortable integration without some intervention, totally missing the influences and roles of anchor institutions like universities (Hyde Park, Kenwood, Tri-Taylor) or strong community organizations (the Beverly Planning Association or Northwest Neighborhood Federation in Beverly and Belmont Cragin, respectively) played, again often using similar strategies pioneered by Oak Park-far from the hands-off approach Mr. Messina thinks allowed integration to start.   


The most amusing but troubling naivety probably comes from his concerns for property depreciation from the current economic climate and nationwide crisis in foreclosures and his belief that preserving property values, his and mine, are in some way connected to his ability to advertise with real estate signs.  


Kurt Hedlund

Oak Park

 





Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the Web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and e-mail address are for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Name:
Telephone:
E-mail:
Passcode: This form will not send your comment unless you copy exactly the passcode seen below into the text field. This is an anti-spam device to help reduce the automated email spam coming through this form.

Please copy the passcode exactly
- it is case sensitive.
Message:
   






Copyright 2010, Wednesday Journal, Inc.,
141 S. Oak Park Ave., Oak Park, IL 60302, 708-524-8300

To view any of the publications owned and operated
by Wednesday Journal, Inc., click on the appropriate title.

Forest Park Review · Riverside Brookfield Landmark
Chicago Journal · Skyline · Austin Weekly News · Chicago Parent magazine


Copyright 2010, Wednesday Journal Inc.

Software © 1998-2010 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved